4.7 Article

Improved Doxorubicin Encapsulation and Pharmacokinetics of Ferritin-Fusion Protein Nanocarriers Bearing Proline, Serine, and Alanine Elements

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 514-522

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01446

关键词

-

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance Project FaReBio di Qualita
  2. MIUR flagship Project Nanomax
  3. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) I.G. Grant [14204, 16776]
  4. Fondazione Cariverona
  5. Verona Nanomedicine Initiative
  6. AIRC Special Program Molecular Clinical Oncology [5X1000, 12214]
  7. [RF-2010-2305526]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel human ferritin-based nanocarrier, composed of 24 modified monomers able to auto-assemble into a modified protein cage, was produced and used as selective carrier of anti-tumor payloads. Each modified monomer derives from the genetic fusion of two distinct modules, namely the heavy chain of human ferritin (HFt) and a stabilizing/protective PAS polypeptide sequence rich in proline (13), serine (5), and alanine (A) residues. Two genetically fused protein constructs containing PAS polymers with 40- and 75-residue lengths, respectively, were compared. They were produced and purified as recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli at high yields. Both preparations were highly soluble and stable in vitro as well as in mouse plasma. Size exclusion chromatography, dynamic light scattering, and transmission electron microscopy results indicated that PASylated ferritins are fully assembled and highly monodispersed. In addition, yields significantly better for both HFt-PAS proteins than for wild-type HFt. Importantly, PAS sequences considerably prolonged the half-life of HFt in the mouse bloodstream. Finally, our doxorubicin-loaded nanocages preserved the pharmacological activity of the drug. Taken together, these results indicate that both of the developed HFt-PAS fusion proteins are promising nanocarriers for future applications in cancer therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据