4.8 Article

ImmuneRegulation: a web-based tool for identifying human immune regulatory elements

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 W1, 页码 W142-W150

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz450

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI118610-01, AI 089992]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [ZIAAI001143, ZIAAI001152] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Humans vary considerably both in their baseline and activated immune phenotypes. We developed a user-friendly open-access web portal, ImmuneRegulation, that enables users to interactively explore immune regulatory elements that drive cell-type or cohort-specific gene expression levels. ImmuneRegulation currently provides the largest centrally integrated resource on human transcriptome regulation across whole blood and blood cell types, including (i) similar to 43,000 genotyped individuals with associated gene expression data from similar to 51,000 experiments, yielding genetic variant-gene expression associations on similar to 220 million eQTLs; (ii) 14 million transcription factor (TF)-binding region hits extracted from 1945 ChIP-seq studies; and (iii) the latest GWAS catalog with 67,230 published variant-trait associations. Users can interactively explore associations between queried gene(s) and their regulators (cise-QTLs, trans-eQTLs or TFs) across multiple cohorts and studies. These regulatorsmay explain genotype-dependent gene expression variations and be critical in selecting the ideal cohorts or cell types for follow-up studies or in developing predictive models. Overall, ImmuneRegulation significantly lowers the barriers between complex immune regulation data and researchers who want rapid, intuitive and high-quality access to the effects of regulatory elements on gene expression in multiple studies to empower investigators in translating these rich data into biological insights and clinical applications, and is freely available at https://immuneregulation.mssm.edu.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据