4.8 Review

Recent progress on in situ characterizations of electrochemically intercalated transition metal dichalcogenides

期刊

NANO RESEARCH
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 2126-2139

出版社

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-019-2408-6

关键词

transition metal dichalcogenides; electrochemical intercalation; in situ characterizations; transmission electron microscopy (TEM); magnetotransport measurements

资金

  1. National Science Foundation Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems [1749742]
  2. Department of Energy [DE-SC0014476]
  3. Army Research Office [71816-MS]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0014476] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1749742] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Layered transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) have been extensively studied owing to their unique physical and chemical properties. Weak van der Waals (vdW) interactions between the stacking layers of TMDCs allow intercalation of various species including monovalent alkali, divalent alkaline earth and multivalent metal ions, zero-valent transition metals, as well as organic molecules, all of which can drastically alter fundamental properties of the TMDCs. The urge to understand the phenomena and the desire to exploit them for applications have inspired a great deal of investigations. A large portion of the mystery has been unveiled over the past decade of intense research; however, many questions remain open and require further explorations. This review is concerned with investigations on structural and electronic evolution of TMDCs driven by electrochemically controlled intercalations. Herein, we aim to survey the recent advances and experimental platforms for monitoring the intercalation processes in situ by utilizing nanodevices. In addition, several inquiries and prospects are outlined in a broader context for future avenues of studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据