4.5 Article

Insufficient evidence for a role of SERPINF1 in otosclerosis

期刊

MOLECULAR GENETICS AND GENOMICS
卷 294, 期 4, 页码 1001-1006

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00438-019-01558-8

关键词

Otosclerosis; SERPINF1; Single molecule-molecular inversion probes; Resequencing

资金

  1. Belgian Science Policy Office Interuniversity Attraction Poles (BELSPO-IAP) program [IAP P7/43-BeMGI]
  2. Flemish Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT) [131526]
  3. Commissie Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (CWO) from the University of Antwerp
  4. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) [12D1717 N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Otosclerosis is a common form of hearing loss (HL) due to abnormal remodeling of the otic capsule. The genetic causes of otosclerosis remain largely unidentified. Only mutations in a single gene, SERPINF1, were previously published in patients with familial otosclerosis. To unravel the contribution of genetic variation in this gene to otosclerosis, this gene was re-sequenced in a large population of otosclerosis patients and controls. Resequencing of the 5' and 3' UTRs, coding regions, and exon-intron boundaries of SERPINF1 was performed in 1604 unrelated otosclerosis patients and 1538 unscreened controls, and in 62 large otosclerosis families. Our study showed no enrichment of rare variants, stratified by type, in SERPINF1 in patients versus controls. Furthermore, the c.392C>A (p.Ala131Asp) variant, previously reported as pathogenic, was identified in three patients and four controls, not replicating its pathogenic nature. We could also not find evidence for a pathogenic role in otosclerosis for 5' UTR variants in the SERPINF1-012 transcript (ENST00000573763), described as the major transcript in human stapes. Furthermore, no rare variants were identified in the otosclerosis families. This study does not support a pathogenic role for variants in SERPINF1 as a cause of otosclerosis. Therefore, the etiology of the disease remains largely unknown and will undoubtedly be the focus of future studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据