4.7 Article

External validation of the modified PAGE-B score in Asian chronic hepatitis B patients receiving antiviral therapy

期刊

LIVER INTERNATIONAL
卷 39, 期 9, 页码 1624-1630

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/liv.14129

关键词

comparison; hepatocellular carcinoma; modified PAGE-B; prediction; validation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Aims The modified PAGE-B (mPAGE-B) score comprising age, gender, platelet count and albumin was recently proposed to predict hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk among chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients undergoing antivirals. Here, in the independent cohort, we externally validated the predictive performance of the mPAGE-B score and compared it with those of conventional HCC prediction models. Methods We consecutively recruited CHB patients treated with lamivudine, entecavir or tenofovir as the first-line antiviral regimen. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis or HCC at baseline were excluded. Predictive performances of the mPAGE-B score and other models were assessed with comparison. Results Among 1330 patients, 9.6% developed HCC during follow-up. The mPAGE-B score provided the highest Harrell's c-index (0.769), followed by the GAG-HCC (0.751), PAGE (0.744), REACH-B (0.686) and CU-HCC (0.618) scores. The mPAGE-B score showed the similar performance to the PAGE-B and GAG-HCC scores and the better performance than the REACH-B and CU-HCC scores. Cumulative HCC probabilities at 5- and 7-years were 0.0% and 0.0% in low-risk group (mPAGE-B score <= 8), 6.1% and 10.8% in intermediate-risk group (mPAGE-B score 9-12) and 18.7% and 26.7% in high-risk group (mPAGE-B score >= 13) respectively (both P < 0.001 between adjacent two groups). C-indices of the mPAGE-B score were 0.785 and 0.724 among subgroups treated with entecavir or tenofovir (n = 1011) and with lamivudine (n = 319), respectively, which are overall similar to those of the PAGE-B score. Conclusion The mPAGE-B score showed acceptable predictive performances. Compared to the PAGE-B score, addition of albumin as a constituent provided the marginal benefit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据