4.7 Article

Comparative Analysis of the Transcriptome and Proteome during Mouse Placental Development

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 2088-2099

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00970

关键词

placenta; trophoblast invasion; proteomics; transcriptomics; phosphoproteomics; multiomics; mouse; development

资金

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health [R00HD079545]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [R01GM120316]
  3. USDANIFA Hatch [3808]
  4. Saudi Arabian Cultural Mission, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The condition of the placenta is a determinant of the short and long-term health of the mother and the fetus. However, critical processes occurring in early placental development, such as trophoblast invasion and establishment of placental metabolism, remain poorly understood. To gain a better understanding of the genes involved in regulating these processes, we utilized a multiomics approach, incorporating transcriptome, proteome, and phosphoproteome data generated from mouse placental tissue collected at two critical developmental time points. We found that incorporating information from both the transcriptome and proteome identifies genes associated with time point-specific biological processes, unlike using the proteome alone. We further inferred genes upregulated on the basis of the proteome data but not the transcriptome data at each time point, leading us to identify 27 genes that we predict to have a role in trophoblast migration or placental metabolism. Finally, using the phosphoproteome data set, we discovered novel phosphorites that may play crucial roles in the regulation of placental transcription factors. By generating the largest proteome and phosphoproteome data sets in the developing placenta, and integrating transcriptome analysis, we uncovered novel aspects of placental gene regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据