4.7 Article

Colorectal Cancer, Systemic Inflammation, and Outcome Staging the Tumor and Staging the Host

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGERY
卷 263, 期 2, 页码 326-336

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001122

关键词

colorectal cancer; modified Glasgow Prognostic Score; prognosis; survival; systemic inflammation

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective:This study aims to examine the clinical utility of the combination of TNM stage and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) in patients undergoing potentially curative resection of colorectal cancer (CRC).Background:Of measures of the systemic inflammatory response, the mGPS has been most extensively validated in patients with cancer.Methods:Data from 1000 consecutive patients undergoing potentially curative CRC resection from a single institution (January 1997-May 2013) were included. The relationship between mGPS [0-C-reactive protein (CRP) 10 mg/L, 1CRP > 10 mg/L and albumin 35 g/L, 2CRP > 10 mg/L and albumin < 35 g/L], TNM stage, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) was examined using Kaplan-Meier log-rank survival analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis.Results:An mGPS of 0, 1, and 2 was observed in 63%, 21%, and 16% of patients, respectively. Median follow-up was 56 months (interquartile range: 28-107 months). TNM and mGPS were independently associated with CSS and OS (all P < 0.001). In all patients, TNM and mGPS stratified 5-year CSS and OS from 97% and 87% (stage I, mGPS = 0) to 32% and 26% (stage III, mGPS = 2), respectively. In patients undergoing elective resection of colon cancer (n = 575), 5-year CSS and OS ranged from 100% and 87% (stage I, mGPS = 0) to 37% and 30% (stage III, mGPS = 2), respectively.Conclusions:This study shows how the combination of TNM and mGPS effectively stratifies outcome in patients undergoing potentially curative resection of CRC. These data support routine staging of both the tumor and the host in patients with CRC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据