Clinicians’ Concerns About Mobile Ecological Momentary Assessment Tools Designed for Emerging Psychiatric Problems: Prospective Acceptability Assessment of the MEmind App
出版年份 2018 全文链接
标题
Clinicians’ Concerns About Mobile Ecological Momentary Assessment Tools Designed for Emerging Psychiatric Problems: Prospective Acceptability Assessment of the MEmind App
作者
关键词
-
出版物
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages e10111
出版商
JMIR Publications Inc.
发表日期
2018-10-19
DOI
10.2196/10111
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Suicide prevention: Towards integrative, innovative and individualized brief contact interventions
- (2018) S. Berrouiguet et al. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY
- Impact of a Web-Based Electronic Health Record on Behavioral Health Service Delivery for Children and Adolescents: Randomized Controlled Trial
- (2018) Eric J Bruns et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- From eHealth to iHealth: Transition to Participatory and Personalized Medicine in Mental Health
- (2018) Sofian Berrouiguet et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians’ experiences with EHRs in Finland
- (2017) Johanna Kaipio et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS
- User profiles of an electronic mental health tool for ecological momentary assessment: MEmind
- (2017) María Luisa Barrigón et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
- Ecological Assessment of Clinicians’ Antipsychotic Prescription Habits in Psychiatric Inpatients: A Novel Web- and Mobile Phone–Based Prototype for a Dynamic Clinical Decision Support System
- (2017) Sofian Berrouiguet et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Tablet-Based Patient-Centered Decision Support for Minor Head Injury in the Emergency Department: Pilot Study
- (2017) Navdeep Singh et al. JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- Development of a Web-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Drug Prescription: Non-Interventional Naturalistic Description of the Antipsychotic Prescription Patterns in 4345 Outpatients and Future Applications
- (2016) Sofian Berrouiguet et al. PLoS One
- Validation of the French version of the Acceptability E-scale (AES) for mental E-health systems
- (2016) Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi et al. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
- EHR Adoption and Hospital Performance: Time-Related Effects
- (2015) Julia Adler-Milstein et al. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Using electronic health records for clinical research: The case of the EHR4CR project
- (2015) Georges De Moor et al. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS
- An eHealth Application in Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care: Health Care Professionals' Perspectives
- (2015) Sanne Duman-Lubberding et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Mobile Technologies: Expectancy, Usage, and Acceptance of Clinical Staff and Patients at a University Medical Center
- (2014) Kristin Illiger et al. JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- Electronic health records: new opportunities for clinical research
- (2013) P. Coorevits et al. JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- A Comparison of Physician Pre-Adoption and Adoption Views on Electronic Health Records in Canadian Medical Practices
- (2011) Norm Archer et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Legal, Ethical, and Financial Dilemmas in Electronic Health Record Adoption and Use
- (2011) D. F. Sittig et al. PEDIATRICS
- Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions
- (2010) Albert Boonstra et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- The inadvertent disclosure of personal health information through peer-to-peer file sharing programs
- (2010) Khaled El Emam et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION
- Validation and testing of the Acceptability E-scale for Web-based patient-reported outcomes in cancer care
- (2009) Joseph D. Tariman et al. APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started