4.7 Article

Chromatin landscapes reveal developmentally encoded transcriptional states that define human glioblastoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 216, 期 5, 页码 1071-1090

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20190196

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA217066, CA217065, CA203101, CA197718, CA154130, CA169117, CA171652, NS087913, NS089272, NS103434]
  2. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas [RR150093]
  3. National Cancer Institute [1R01CA215452-01]
  4. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas scholar award [RR170023]
  5. Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation for Childhood Cancer young investigator award
  6. Rally Foundation research grant
  7. BEAR Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation Grant
  8. Children's Cancer Research Fund award
  9. Children's Brain Tumor Foundation Award
  10. Baylor College of Medicine Junior Faculty Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glioblastoma is an incurable brain cancer characterized by high genetic and pathological heterogeneity. Here, we mapped active chromatin landscapes with gene expression, whole exomes, copy number profiles, and DNA methylomes across 44 patient-derived glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs), 50 primary tumors, and 10 neural stem cells (NSCs) to identify essential super-enhancer (SE)-associated genes and the core transcription factors that establish SEs and maintain GSC identity. GSCs segregate into two groups dominated by distinct enhancer profiles and unique developmental core transcription factor regulatory programs. Group-specific transcription factors enforce GSC identity; they exhibit higher activity in glioblastomas versus NSCs, are associated with poor clinical outcomes, and are required for glioblastoma growth in vivo. Although transcription factors are commonly considered undruggable, group-specific enhancer regulation of the MAPK/ERK pathway predicts sensitivity to MEK inhibition. These data demonstrate that transcriptional identity can be leveraged to identify novel dependencies and therapeutic approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据