4.3 Article

US real-world effectiveness of secukinumab for the treatment of psoriasis: 6-month analysis from the Corrona Psoriasis Registry

期刊

JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 333-341

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1603361

关键词

Psoriasis; Corrona Psoriasis Registry; secukinumab; effectiveness

资金

  1. AbbVie
  2. Amgen
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  5. Celgene
  6. Crescendo
  7. Eli Lilly and Company
  8. Genentech
  9. Gilead
  10. GlaxoSmithKline
  11. Janssen
  12. Merck
  13. Momenta Pharmaceuticals
  14. Novartis
  15. Pfizer
  16. Roche
  17. UCB
  18. Valeant
  19. Eli Lilly
  20. Janssen/Johnson Johnson
  21. Kadmon
  22. MedImmune/AstraZeneca
  23. Vidac

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine the real-world effectiveness of secukinumab with regard to clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from enrollment to a 6-month follow-up visit in patients with psoriasis in the Corrona Psoriasis Registry. Methods: Eligible patients aged >= 18 years who initiated secukinumab at enrollment in the Corrona Psoriasis Registry and had a 6-month follow-up visit (window: 5-9 months) as of December 31 2017, were included in the analysis. Measures of disease severity and PROs were assessed in patients who maintained secukinumab treatment at the 6-month follow-up visit. Results: Of the 144 patients who initiated secukinumab at enrollment and had a 6-month follow-up visit, 118 (81.9%) maintained secukinumab treatment at 6 months and demonstrated significant improvements in affected body surface area (BSA) and 5-point Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score (all p < .01). The majority of patients were biologic experienced (89.8%). In addition, patients reported significant improvements in quality of life, as well as in pain, itch, fatigue, work productivity, and daily activities (all p < .01). Conclusions: Secukinumab significantly improved disease severity and PROs after 6 months of follow-up in this real-world study, which is consistent with other current real-world studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据