4.6 Article

Early seeds of axion miniclusters

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/04/012

关键词

axions; Cosmic strings; domain walls; monopoles; cosmological simulations; dark matter simulations

资金

  1. Ramon y Cajal Fellowship [201210597]
  2. MINECO/FEDER [FPA2015-65745-P]
  3. EU through the ITN Elusives [H2020-MSCA-ITN-2015/674896]
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB1258]
  5. U.S. National Science Foundation [PHY14-14614]
  6. European Union [674896]
  7. STFC [ST/P001246/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the small scale structure of axion dark matter in the post-inflationary scenario, which predicts the formation of low-mass, high density clumps of gravitationally bound axions called axion miniclusters. To this end we follow numerically the cosmological evolution of the axion field and the network of strings and domain walls until the density contrast is frozen. Our simulations, comprising up to 8192(3) points, are the largest studies of the axion field evolution in the non-linear regime presented so far. Axitons, pseudo-breathers of the Klein-Gordon equation, are observed to form in our simulation at late times. Studying their properties analytically and numerically, we observe that in particular the earliest axitons contribute to density perturbations at the typical length scale of miniclusters. We analyse the small scale structure of the density field, giving the correlation length, power spectrum and the distribution of high density regions that will collapse into axion miniclusters. The final density field of our simulations can be used to calculate the minicluster mass fraction in simulations including gravity. In particular, we find that typical minicluster progenitors are smaller than previously thought and only of moderate, O(1) overdensity. We expect these miniclusters to have a rich sub-structure, emerging from small-scale fluctuations produced in the collapse of the string-wall network and from axitons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据