4.7 Article

Chlorine-resistant sulfochlorinated and sulfonated polysulfone for reverse osmosis membranes by coating method

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 541, 期 -, 页码 434-443

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.104

关键词

RO membrane; Chlorine resistance; Sulfochlorinated polysulfone; Polysulfone-sulfamide

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB655302]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [51473163]
  3. Development of Scientific and Technological Project of the Jilin Province [20140203004GX, 20160519006JH]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, sulfochlorinated polysulfone (SC-PSf), a functional polysulfone with chlorine resistance, was synthesized through metalation sulfochlorination of polysulfone (PSf). For endowing the required hydrophilicity of SC-PSf, the sulfonyl chloride groups on SC-PSf were partially hydrolyzed to sulfonic groups to produce sulfonated SC-PSf (SC-S-PSf). Thin film composite (TFC) membranes for reverse osmosis application were fabricated by coating solution of SC-S-PSf on porous PSf substrate and then crosslinked by piperazine (PIP) to form polysulfone-sulfamide (PSSA) skin layer. In order to enhance the spreadability of polymer solution on PSf supporting layer, tetrabutylammonium chloride (TBAC), a common surfactant, was added into the coating solution. A flawless membrane was acquired only by a single coating step and at dilute SC-S-PSf solution when TBAC was added into polymer solution. Through optimizing coating conditions, the NaCl rejection and water flux of PSSA membrane reached 96.9% and 17.8 L/m(2)h under brackish desalination conditions. Moreover, the PSSA membrane exhibited the long-term stability against chlorine during the operation condition of 2000 ppm NaOCl for 10 days. The salt rejection of PSSA only decreased by 1%. In contrast, the salt rejection of polyamide membrane decreased by 8% under the same condition. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据