4.7 Article

Relations of the Low-Level Extratropical Cyclones in the Southeast Pacific and South Atlantic to the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
卷 32, 期 14, 页码 4167-4178

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0564.1

关键词

Extratropical cyclones; Climate variability; Multidecadal variability

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) of Brazil [302322/2017-5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relations of the low-level extratropical cyclones in the southeastern Pacific and South Atlantic with the sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies associated with the Atlantic multidecadal oscillation (AMO) during the summer and winter of the 1979-93 cold AMO (CAMO) and 2003-17 warm AMO (WAMO) are analyzed. During both seasons and in both AMO phases, the cyclone trajectories defined by cyclone local counts exceeding 10 events per grid box occur approximately in the areas with the AMO-related positive SST anomalies. The cyclone densities in most latitudes during both seasons are higher in the CAMO than in the WAMO. Thus, the cyclone density in the study domain presents a reduction trend during the 1979-2017 period. The large-scale northward SST anomalous gradients between the bands north and south of 40 degrees S increase the long-wave baroclinicity in the midlatitudes in the WAMO, and the southward SST anomalous gradients decrease it in the CAMO. Consequently, the short-wave baroclinicity is higher in the WAMO than in the CAMO in the southeastern Pacific midlatitudes. Thus, the cyclones are more energetic in the WAMO than in the CAMO. In the South Atlantic region off the Argentinean coast, both the barotropic and baroclinic conversion terms are positive, indicating an increase of the kinetic energy of the short waves. The low-level cyclones in the southeastern Pacific and South Atlantic are modulated by the AMO. As far as we know, the relation of the SH low-level extratropical cyclones to the AMO documented here was not studied before.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据