4.5 Article

N-phenyl-carbazole as a potential liquid organic hydrogen carrier: Thermochemical and computational study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THERMODYNAMICS
卷 132, 期 -, 页码 122-128

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2018.12.032

关键词

N-phenyl-carbazole; Vapour pressure measurements; Thermodynamic properties; Quantum-chemical calculations

资金

  1. Government of Russian Federation [Z50.31.0038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The liquid organic hydrogen carriers (LOHCs) are promising materials for hydrogen storage. The standard molar enthalpy of formation, Delta H-f(m)o(cr, 298.15 K) = (196.0 +/- 4.9) kJ.mol (1), of N-phenyl-carbazole was obtained from high-precision combustion calorimetry. The standard molar enthalpy of sublimation Delta H-g(cr)m(o)(298.15 K)= (116.1 +/- 1.7) kJ.mol (1) and vaporisation Delta H-g(1)m(o) (298.15 K) = (100.5 +/- 1.6) kJ.mol (1) of Nphenyl-carbazole were derived from the vapour pressure temperature dependences measured by the transpiration method. The standard molar enthalpy of fusion Delta H-1(cr)m(o) = (19.4 +/- 0.3) kJ.mol (1) at T-fus = 367.9 K was measured by DSC. Gas phase molar enthalpy of formation of N-phenyl-carbazole calculated by the high-level quantum-chemical method G4 Delta H-f(m)o (g, 298.15 K)= (312.9 +/- 3.5) kJ.mol (1), was in an excellent agreement with the experimental result (312.1 +/- 5.2) kJ.mol (1). The hydrogenation/dehydrogenation reaction enthalpy result (-519.3 +/- 6.6) kJ.mol (1) of N-phenyl-carbazole was calculated and compared with the data for other potential liquid organic hydrogen carriers. Phase transition enthalpies were validated with the help of empirical methods. A set of thermodynamic properties of N-phenyl-carbazole were recommended as reliable benchmark properties for thermochemical calculations. Due to the high hydrogen storage capacity, as well as the ability to form overcooled liquid even by room temperature, this compound could be considered as seminal candidate for LOHC. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据