4.7 Article

Enhanced Antiarthritic Efficacy by Nanoparticles of (-)-Epigallocatechin Gallate-Glucosamine-Casein

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 67, 期 23, 页码 6476-6486

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b02075

关键词

(-)-epigallocatechin gallate; glucosamine; caseins; nanoparticle; arthritis

资金

  1. Key R&D Program Project of Zhejiang Province, China [2019C02072]
  2. Fund for Distinguished Scholars of Zhejiang Agricultural and Forestry University [2014FR064]
  3. Key R&D Program Project of China [2017YFD0400803]
  4. Zhejiang Innovation discipline titled with Laboratory Animal Genetic Engineering [201604]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work aims to improve the antiarthritic activity of (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and glucosamine (GA) through fabrication and optimization of casein protein nanoparticles (EGC-NPs). Optimized EGC-NPs were obtained with a EGCG/GA/casein ratio of 1:2:8 (w/w/w). The EGC-NPs gave a mean size of 186 +/- 3.5 nm and an entrapment efficiency of 86.8 +/- 2.7%, and they exhibited a greater inhibitory activity against human fibroblast-like synoviocytesosteoarthritis cells and human fibroblast-like synoviocytes-rheumatoid arthritis cells compared with that of the EGCG-GA mixture by 33.5% and 20.8%, respectively. Freeze-dried EGC-NPs stored at 25 degrees C during 12 months showed high dispersion stability. Moreover, the redispersion of the freeze-dried EGC-NPs produced almost no significant changes in their physicochemical properties and bioactivity. Rat experiments demonstrated that the antiarthritis effect of the EGC-NPs was significantly higher than that of EGCG-GA mixture, as assessed through an analysis of anti-inflammatory efficacy, radiographic images and histopathological assessments of paw joints, and immunohistochemical changes in serum cytokines. The enchanted antiarthritic activity in vivo was consistent with that in vitro. The EGC-NPs demonstrate potential as a food supplement for the treatment of arthritis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据