4.6 Review

Changes in critically ill cancer patients' short-term outcome over the last decades: results of systematic review with meta-analysis on individual data

期刊

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
卷 45, 期 7, 页码 977-987

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05653-7

关键词

Prognosis; Outcomes; Hematologic neoplasms; Intensive care units; Mechanical ventilation; Neutropenia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeThe number of averted deaths due to therapeutic advances in oncology and hematology is substantial and increasing. Survival of critically ill cancer patients has also improved during the last 2decades. However, these data stem predominantly from unadjusted analyses. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of ICU admission year on short-term survival of critically ill cancer patients, with special attention on those with neutropenia.MethodsSystematic review and meta-analysis of individual data according to the guidelines of meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology.DatasourcePubmed and Cochrane databases.Eligibility criteriaAdult studies published in English between May 2005 and May 2015.ResultsOverall, 7354 patients were included among whom 1666 presented with neutropenia at ICU admission. Median ICU admission year was 2007 (IQR 2004-2010; range 1994-2012) and median number of admissions per year was 693 (IQR 450-1007). Overall mortality was 47.7%. ICU admission year was associated with a progressive decrease in hospital mortality (OR per year 0.94; 95% CI 0.93-0.95). After adjustment for confounders, year of ICU admission was independently associated with hospital mortality (OR for hospital mortality per year: 0.96; 95% CI 0.95-0.97). The association was also seen in patients with neutropenia but not in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients.ConclusionAfter adjustment for patient characteristics, severity of illness and clustering, hospital mortality decreased steadily over time in critically ill oncology and hematology patients except for allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据