4.7 Article

Factors associated with early in vitro fertilization treatment discontinuation

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 112, 期 1, 页码 105-111

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.03.007

关键词

IVF; IVF insurance; treatment termination; disparity; access to care

资金

  1. Clinical and Translational Science Award of the National Institutes of Health [TL1TR002344]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate factors associated with early IVF treatment discontinuation. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Academic medical center. Patient(s): Six hundred sixty-nine first-attempt IVF patients who did not have a live birth. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Treatment discontinuation and time to return for a second IVF cycle. Result(s): Women without IVF insurance coverage were more likely to discontinue treatment than women with insurance coverage (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.22-4.40). African-American women were more likely to discontinue treatment (aOR = 2.95; 95% CI, 1.54-5.66) and returned for treatment more slowly (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.28-0.71) than non-Hispanic white women, regardless of IVF insurance coverage or income. Women with a poor prognosis were more likely to discontinue treatment than women with a good prognosis. Older women with IVF insurance coverage or a good prognosis had a shorter time to return for a second IVF cycle than older women without IVF insurance coverage or with a poor prognosis. Estimated income, distance to clinic, fertility diagnosis, number of oocytes retrieved, and history of previous live birth were not associated with treatment discontinuation or time to return for a second IVF cycle after adjustment for covariates. Conclusion(s): IVF insurance coverage, race, age, and future treatment prognosis are associated with IVF treatment discontinuation and time to return. ((C) 2019 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据