4.4 Review

Institutional protocols for the oral administration (gavage) of chemicals and microscopic microbial communities to mice: Analytical consensus

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 244, 期 6, 页码 459-470

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1535370219838203

关键词

Gavage; gnotobiotic; mouse models; microbiome; inflammatory bowel disease; fecal matter transplant

资金

  1. NHI [R21DK118373]
  2. NIH P30 Silvio O. Conte Cleveland Digestive Disease Research Core Center [DK097948]
  3. Germ-free and Gut Microbiome Core at CWRU [NIH 2P01DK091222-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although there are numerous Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocols aimed at standardizing the oral administration (gavage) of liquid chemicals to laboratory rodents, there is ample variability across protocols, and there are no protocols intended for the gavage of microbial communities to mice or rats. The objective of this study was to conduct a scoping review of publically available IACUC protocols from institutions in the United States, identify protocol criteria and deficiencies, and generate an 'analytical consensus' to unify such criteria into two revised protocols: one for chemicals, and another for microbes in mice. Eighteen (n = 18) written institutional protocols from prominent universities, and 26 demonstrations videos from various sources (accounting for >155,000 views) were identified in the World Wide Web. Although written protocols listed up to five criteria for consideration (dosing/volume, pregnancy, animal weight), collectively there was major variability and poor statistical agreement across methods (0% Kappa, p = 0.98). Because protocols also lacked details relevant for the bypassing and survival of live microorganisms in the gastric (antimicrobial) environment, we compiled two 'analytical (Kappa-based) consensus' protocols from available and new criteria, for the 'gavage of chemicals' and for the 'gavage of delicate microscopic microbial communities' to mice. A major difference lies in the volume of administration, (i.e., 20 mL/kg, without restrictions, after 4-6 h of fasting, for microbes), which was graphically illustrated simulating the predicted impact of administering large and small volumes on microbial distribution of simple microscopic communities. In conclusion, publicly available IACUC gavage protocols are highly variable, and do not reflect the need to adjust the dose volumes to ensure the rapid bypassing of the gastric environment which would impact the survival of microbes, especially if composing delicate microscopic communities. An 'analytical consensus' of IACUC-approved protocols is herein presented as a unifying baseline protocol for consideration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据