4.7 Article

Synthesis and application of ion-imprinted polymer for the determination of mercury II in water samples

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 26, 期 19, 页码 19588-19597

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05178-y

关键词

Ion-imprinted polymer; SPE; Mercury; Voltammetry

资金

  1. Brazilian institution CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior)
  2. Brazilian institution CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico)
  3. Brazilian institution FAPERJ (Fundacao Carlos Chagas de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an innovative analytical methodology capable of selectively identifying and quantifying mercury contamination by the association of solid-phase extraction using ion-imprinted polymers as a sorbent phase and differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry is proposed. To this end, the ion-imprinted polymers were synthesized and characterized by infrared spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy. The sorption capacities and the selectivity of the ion-imprinted polymers were compared to the ones related to the non-imprinted ones. Next, the experimental parameters of this solid-phase extraction method (IIP-SPE) were evaluated univariately. The selectivity of this polymeric matrix against other cations (Cd II, Pb II, and Cu II) was also evaluated. Limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) obtained for the here proposed methodology were 0.322gL(-1) and 1.08gL(-1), respectively. Also, the precision of 4.0% was achieved. The method was finally applied to three water samples from different sources: for the Piratininga and Itaipu Lagoon waters, Hg II concentrations were below the LOQ and for Vargem River waters a concentration equal to 1.35 +/- 0.07mgL(-1) was determined. These results were confirmed by recovery tests, resulting in a recovery of 96.2 +/- 4.0%, and by comparison with flame atomic absorption spectrometry, resulting in statistical conformity between the two methods at 95% confidence level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据