4.7 Article

Research on the Effect of the Solvent Structure and Group on Separation of 1-Hexene, Benzene, and Thiophene

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 5162-5172

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b00939

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2018YFC1902603]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21822810, 21838011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have investigated the separation of olefins from fluid catalytic cracking naphtha by solvent treatment to produce motor gasoline. This study explored the effect of the structure and group of six solvents on the separation of the 1-hexene-benzene and 1-hexene-thiophene systems. Solvents with a chain structure, such as N-methyl diethanolamine (MDEA) and tetraethylene glycol, showed satisfactory separation performance for olefins but poor performance for benzene and thiophene. This result can be ascribed to the weak polarity of the chain structure for the low solubility of benzene and thiophene. By contrast, solvents with a ring structure separated 1-hexene by enhancing the solubility of the mixture for the solvent, especially the dissolution of benzene and thiophene. The selective dissolution of benzene and thiophene by the solvent containing a ring structure was generally greater than that by the solvent containing a chain structure. At the highest 1-hexene content, the solubility of N-methyl diethanolamine for benzene and thiophene was higher than 11, whereas that of MDEA with the chain structure was only 7. The highly electronegative sulfoxide group improved the selectivity for olefins. The selectivity theta of 1-hexene by sulfolane and dimethyl sulfoxide in separating 1-hexene from benzene or thiophene was about 2-14 times that of alcohol amine solvents. Therefore, the ring structure primarily enhanced the processing capacity of the solvents in the separation of the olefins-aromatics/sulfide system, whereas the sulfoxide group improved the selectivity of the solvents in the separation of olefins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据