4.7 Article

Analysis of cyclic aging performance of commercial Li4Ti5O12-based batteries at room temperature

期刊

ENERGY
卷 173, 期 -, 页码 1041-1053

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.150

关键词

Lithium titanate batteries; Aging mechanisms; Incremental capacity; Differential voltage; Loss of active material

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1664255]
  2. Zero Emission Urban Bus System (ZeEUS) project
  3. European Commission under the 7th Research and Technological Development Framework Programme, Mobility & Transport Directorate General [605485]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium-ion batteries with Li4Ti5O12 (LTO) negative electrodes have been recognized as a promising candidate over graphite-based batteries for the future energy storage systems (ESS), due to its excellent performance in rate capability, cycle life and inherent safety. Accurate identification of battery degradation mechanisms is of great significance for reliable management and sustainable capability of ESS. Unfortunately, only a few quantitative analysis regarding LTO batteries are drawn at extreme conditions including designed overcharge and cycling at high temperatures. In this paper, cyclic aging behaviors of commercial LTO batteries are investigated at room temperature (RT) by applying incremental capacity and differential voltage techniques. A typical sketch of regional divisions among the voltage curve of a LTO battery is presented to explain the effects induced by different degradation modes on battery performance. The results imply that the loss of active material in the positive electrode occupies at least 83% and 81% of the total capacity loss under cycling at 10C and 5C respectively, while pure loss of lithium inventory is detectable when cycling at 5C rather than at 10C. Depth of discharge is further considered as the dominant stress of LTO batteries during the high-rate operation at RT. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据