4.7 Article

Evolution of microbial community and drug resistance during enrichment of tetracycline-degrading bacteria

期刊

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 746-752

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.01.047

关键词

High-concentration tetracycline; Activated sludge; Tetracycline-degrading consortium; ARGs co-transfer; Risk evaluation of biodegradation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 21477035, NSFC 21277041, 5101049170806]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, the microbial degradation of tetracycline has been widely reported. However, its potential risks in treating wastewater containing high concentrations of tetracycline have not been fully evaluated. In this study, the evolution of the microbial community and drug resistance was traced during the enrichment of tetracycline degrading bacteria. The results showed that some minor compositions such as Shewanella, Bacillus, and Pseudomonas in the seed sludge became the predominant genera in the enrichment cultures when continuously using tetracycline as the sole carbon source, especially some possible pathogenic bacteria increased significantly in this process. The abundances of most TRGs/16S rDNA were increased after enrichment, although the relative abundance of tetA and tetL genes decreased to some extent. From the enrichment culture, 7 predominant tetracycline-degrading strains were isolated, of which TD-1 (Bacillus) and TD-5 (Shewanella) presented high degradation efficiencies (6-day degradation rate > 95%, half-life period of tetracycline approximate to 24 h). In addition, multiple TRGs, mobile genetic elements (MGEs) and even gene cassettes were found in each tetracycline-degrading isolate. The findings suggested that some risks such as the pathogenicity of isolates and the spread of ARGs should be considered when the biodegradation method is used to treat wastewater polluted with high concentrations of tetracycline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据