4.6 Article

A Rhenium Isonitrile Complex Induces Unfolded Protein Response-Mediated Apoptosis in Cancer Cells

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 25, 期 39, 页码 9206-9210

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201902223

关键词

bioinorganic chemistry; cancer; endoplasmic reticulum stress; metallodrugs; translation inhibition

资金

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute [55108556] Funding Source: Medline
  2. National Institute of Health [R21CA227917, T32GM008500, R01GM1222814] Funding Source: Medline
  3. National Science Foundation [DGE-1650441, CHE-1531632] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NCI NIH HHS [R21 CA227917] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM122814, T32 GM008500] Funding Source: Medline
  6. US Department of Defense [W81XWH-17-1-0097] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Complexes of the element Re have recently been shown to possess promising anticancer activity through mechanisms of action that are distinct from the conventional metal-based drug cisplatin. In this study, we report our investigations on the anticancer activity of the complex [Re(CO)(3)(dmphen)(p-tol-ICN)](+) (TRIP) in which dmphen=2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline and p-tol-ICN=para-tolyl isonitrile. TRIP was synthesized by literature methods and exhaustively characterized. This compound exhibited potent in vitro anticancer activity in a wide variety of cell lines. Flow cytometry and immunostaining experiments indicated that TRIP induces intrinsic apoptosis. Comprehensive biological mechanistic studies demonstrated that this compound triggers the accumulation of misfolded proteins, which causes endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, the unfolded protein response, and apoptotic cell death. Furthermore, TRIP induced hyperphosphorylation of eIF2 alpha, translation inhibition, mitochondrial fission, and expression of proapoptotic ATF4 and CHOP. These results establish TRIP as a promising anticancer agent based on its potent cytotoxic activity and ability to induce ER stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据