4.6 Article

Multiscale computational fluid dynamics modeling of thermal atomic layer deposition with application to chamber design

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN
卷 147, 期 -, 页码 529-544

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2019.05.049

关键词

Atomic layer deposition; Microscopic modeling; Computational fluid dynamics modeling; Kinetic Monte Carlo modeling; Geometry optimization; ALD cycle time optimization

资金

  1. National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work develops a first-principles-based three-dimensional, multiscale computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model, together with reactor geometry optimizations, of SiO2 thinfilm thermal atomic layer deposition (ALD) using bis(tertiary-butylamino)silane (BTBAS) and ozone as precursors. Specifically, an accurate macroscopic CFD model of the ALD reactor chamber gas-phase development is integrated with a detailed microscopic kinetic Monte Carlo (kMC) model that was developed in Ding et al. (2019), accounting for the microscopic lattice structure, atomic interactions and detailed surface chemical reactions. The multi scale information exchange and the transient simulation of the microscopic distributed kMC algorithms and the macroscopic CFD model are achieved through a parallel processing message passing interface (MPI) structure. Additionally, density functional theory (DFT)-based calculations are adopted to compute the key thermodynamic and kinetic parameters for the microscopic thin-film growth process. Recognizing the transient non-uniformity and the possibility to reduce the current ALD cycle time, the optimal configuration of reactor geometry is designed and evaluated including a showerhead panel adjustment and geometry modifications on reactor inlet and upstream. It is demonstrated that with suitable reactor chamber design the required BTBAS ALD half-cycle time can be reduced by 39.6%. (C) 2019 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据