4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Study on the redox characteristics of CaCo based oxygen carrier for Chemical Looping Combustion

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 377, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.102

关键词

Chemical Looping Combustion; CaCo-based oxygen carrier; Oxygen transfer capacity; Oxygen transfer rate

资金

  1. Energy Efficiency and Resources Core Technology Program of the Korean Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) from the Ministry of Trade, Industry Energy [20152010201840, 20184030202210]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) of Republic of Korea [2018R1D1A3B07050416]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1D1A3B07050416] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated whether a CaCo-based oxygen carrier could be an oxygen-transfer particle for Chemical Looping Combustion (CLC). The analysis was carried out using TGA to see the redox characteristics of the cycle. 15% H-2/N-2 was used as the reducing gas, and air was used as the oxidizing gas. The CaCo-based oxygen carrier maintained a high oxygen-transfer capacity of about 16 wt% for 10 cycles. Also, the oxygen-transfer rate was relatively stable over 10 cycles. The maximum oxygen-transfer rate was about 0.022 mmol O-2/g/s in the reduction section. The maximum oxygen-transfer rate in the oxidation section was about 0.022 mmol O-2/g/s. From the XRD results, the CaCo-based oxygen carrier exhibited a similar XRD pattern after the 10th-cycle oxidation, which confirmed that the phase was stably recovered even though the CaCo-based oxygen carrier was completely reduced to CaO and Co metal during reduction. Although some agglomeration was observed, it did not affect overall oxygen transfer capacity and rates. Conclusively, CaCo-based oxygen carriers show high performance and phase stability, and thus can be potential candidates for oxygen carriers in CLC process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据