4.4 Article

Regulation of insulin resistance by targeting the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor with microRNA-122-5p in hepatic cells

期刊

CELL BIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 43, 期 5, 页码 553-564

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cbin.11129

关键词

gluconeogenesis; insulin resistance; insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor; microRNA-122-5p; PI3K/Akt pathway; type 2 diabetes

资金

  1. Hebei General Hospital, Hebei Medical University
  2. First Hospital of Qinhuangdao

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insulin resistance (IR) is a common etiology of type 2 diabetes (T2D) defined by a state of decreased reactivity to insulin in multiple organs, such as the liver. This study aims to investigate how microRNA-122-5p (miR-122) regulates the hepatic IR in vitro. We first found that the miR-122 level was upregulated in the liver of rats fed with a high-fat diet and injected with streptozotocin (T2D rats), while the expression level of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R), a potential target of miR-122, was downregulated in the diabetic liver. In vitro, glucosamine-induced IR was introduced in HepG2 hepatic cells, and the levels of miR-122 and IGF-1R were further assessed. An increase of miR-122 level and a decrease of IGF-IR level were observed in IR hepatic cells, which was the same as that in the diabetic liver. Results of the luciferase reporter assay validated IGF-1R as a direct target of miR-122. Moreover, in IR HepG2 cells, antagonizing miR-122 with its specific inhibitor enhanced glucose uptake and suppressed the expression of glucose 6-phosphatase and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, two key enzymes in regulating gluconeogenesis. Such alterations induced by the miR-122 inhibitor in IR hepatic cells were impaired when IGF-1R was simultaneously knocked down. In addition, the PI3K/Akt pathway was deactivated in IR cells, and then reactivated with miR-122 inhibitor transfection. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that miR-122 is able to regulate IR in hepatic cells by targeting IGF-1R.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据