4.7 Article

Comprehensive characterization of T-DNA integration induced chromosomal rearrangement in a birch T-DNA mutant

期刊

BMC GENOMICS
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-5636-y

关键词

T-DNA integration; Multiple T-DNA; Chromosomal rearrangement; T-DNA mutant; Birch

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31570647]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2572018CL05]
  3. 111 Project [B16010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundIntegration of T-DNA into plant genomes via Agrobacterium may interrupt gene structure and generate numerous mutants. The T-DNA caused mutants are valuable materials for understanding T-DNA integration model in plant research. T-DNA integration in plants is complex and still largely unknown. In this work, we reported that multiple T-DNA fragments caused chromosomal translocation and deletion in a birch (Betula platyphylla x B. pendula) T-DNA mutant yl.ResultsWe performed PacBio genome resequencing for yl and the result revealed that two ends of a T-DNA can be integrated into plant genome independently because the two ends can be linked to different chromosomes and cause chromosomal translocation. We also found that these T-DNA were connected into tandem fragment regardless of direction before integrating into plant genome. In addition, the integration of T-DNA in yl genome also caused several chromosomal fragments deletion. We then summarized three cases for T-DNA integration model in the yl genome. (1) A T-DNA fragment is linked to the two ends of a double-stranded break (DSB); (2) Only one end of a T-DNA fragment is linked to a DSB; (3) A T-DNA fragment is linked to the ends of different DSBs. All the observations in the yl genome supported the DSB repair model.ConclusionsIn this study, we showed a comprehensive genome analysis of a T-DNA mutant and provide a new insight into T-DNA integration in plants. These findings would be helpful for the analysis of T-DNA mutants with special phenotypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据