4.0 Article

Effects of N-ethylpentylone on locomotor activity and anxiety-like behavior in rats

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 30, 期 6, 页码 500-505

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000484

关键词

anxiety-like behavior; elevated plus maze; locomotor activity; N-ethylpentylone; open field; rat; synthetic cathinones

向作者/读者索取更多资源

N-ethylpentylone (NEP), a new synthetic cathinone, has been rising to be one of the most popular cathinone derivatives in recent years. However, research on NEP is rather limited. In this study, locomotor stimulation and sensitization, as well as anxiety-like behavior induced by NEP were studied in Sprague-Dawley rats, using the open field and elevated plus maze respectively. Rats were administered NEP (5, 20 or 50 mg/kg, intraperitoneal), with saline as the negative control and methamphetamine (5 mg/kg) as a positive control. Acute administration of NEP at all the doses tested significantly promoted locomotor activity, presenting an inverted U-shaped dose-effect curve. The highest activity was observed at the 20 mg/kg dose group, with the average distance traveled 18 times higher than the saline group. Repeated administration of NEP enhanced locomotor activity only at the 5 mg/kg dose group. After a week's withdrawal, re-challenge of NEP failed to induce marked behavioral sensitization. In elevated plus maze experiments, both acute and repeated administration of 20 mg/kg NEP induced anxiolytic-like effects, while no significant alteration was observed in the 5 and 50 mg/kg dose groups. In summary, acute administration of NEP caused significantly enhanced locomotor activity in rats at all the tested doses, while repeated NEP administration enhanced locomotor activity only at a low dose (5 mg/kg), while a high dose (20 mg/kg) of NEP induced anxiolytic-like effects after both acute and repeated administration. Copyright (C) 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据