4.5 Article

Nutritional value and production performance of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis Muller, 1786 cultured with different feeds at commercial scale

期刊

AQUACULTURE INTERNATIONAL
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 875-890

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10499-019-00375-5

关键词

Amino acids; Essential fatty acids; Growth; Nannochloropsis oculata; Rotifer; Spray-dried

资金

  1. Tubitak-Teydeb 1507 Kobi-Arge Project (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) [7170299]
  2. Istanbul University, Research Foundation Project [29086]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rotifer Brachionus plicatilis is the first live feed in larviculture of marine fish species. Rotifer diets differ in their biochemical composition, physical properties, and production technology while feeding protocols largely vary among facilities. The objective of the present study was to determine the effects of two different forms of Nannochloropsis oculata and commonly used commercial diets on growth performance and biochemical composition of rotifers produced under commercial conditions. Rotifers were fed one of five different types of feed: Algome (R) (dried Schizochytrium sp.), Protein Plus (R) (PP), Inactive Baker's Yeast (R) (INBY), spray-dried Nannochloropsis oculata (SDN), or freshly cultured Nannochloropsis oculata (FN). Rotifers fed SDN diet resulted in significantly higher rotifer biomass during 16days of semi-continuous culture, with an increasing biomass trend that lasted 11days, high egg production, and egg-carrying female numbers, whereas rotifers fed PP showed highest Sigma n-3, arachidonic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, and docosahexaenoic acid contents. Amino acid profiles of rotifers were enhanced by utilization of both INBY and SDN diets. Overall, the results indicated that SDN is optimal for long-term biomass production of rotifers. However, their nutritional profile needs to be enriched by feeding PP (EFA source) and INBY (EAA source) once desired biomass production is obtained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据