4.5 Article

Modeling re-oxygenation performance of fine-bubble-diffusing aeration system in aquaculture ponds

期刊

AQUACULTURE INTERNATIONAL
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 1353-1368

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10499-019-00390-6

关键词

Prediction model; Oxygen volume mass transfer; Oxygen utilization rate; Fine-bubble diffusing system; Aquaculture

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51579106]
  2. China Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System [CARS-46-17]
  3. National Key Technology RD Program [2012BAD25B04]
  4. Open Research Fund Program of State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fine-bubble-diffusing (FBD) aeration system is widely used in aquaculture ponds. To maximize its re-oxygenation capability, it is needed to have a quantitative understanding of the reoxygenation performance. In practice, two indexes, namely oxygen volume mass transfer coefficient (K(L)a) and standard oxygen transfer efficiency (E), are commonly used to measure the re-oxygenation performance. However, few mathematical models are available to accurately predict these two indexes. The objective of this regard was to develop such a model driven by commonly available data. In this regard, the results from 54 group laboratory tests were regressed on four independent variables, including air flow rate (Q(g)), aeration tube length (L), submerged water depth of the diffuser (h(d)), and plane-view tank area (A(cs)). The regression revealed that both K(L)a and E are negatively related to h(d) and A(cs), but they are positively related to L. In addition, K(L)a was found to be positively related to Q(g), whereas E was found to be negatively related to Q(g). Two regression models, one for K(L)a while another for E, are expected to be effective tools for operating FBD aeration system in practice to maximize its re-oxygenation capability though they may need to be further verified using field data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据