4.7 Article

Heat transfer mechanism and characteristics of lightweight high temperature ceramic cellular sandwich

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 154, 期 -, 页码 562-572

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.03.126

关键词

High temperature ceramic; Sandwich structure; Thermal protection; Thermal short effect; Finite element analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11602081, 11802044, 11802021]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2017JJ3031]
  3. Fund of State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures [SV2018-KF-18]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Consider the severe thermal loads in thermal engineering applications of lightweight ZrO2 and ZrB2 corrugated sandwich structures, here, their heat transfer mechanism and characteristics are originally explored in this work. Finite element (FE) models for heat transfer of ZrO2 and ZrB2 sandwiches, sandwiches filled with insulation material and the corresponding bulk ceramics are respectively well established. The insulation efficiency, temperature gradient, thermal short effect and thermal-mechanical coupling effect are well calculated and analyzed. It is found that cavity radiation heat flux is increased with the height, leading to low insulation efficiency. The insulation material can block the cavity radiation, and hence can remarkably enhance the insulation efficiency and improve the temperature uniformity. Low temperature gradient is found in ZrO2 and ZrB2 sandwiches, while, remarkable temperature gradients are found in sandwiches filled with insulation material. With the increasing height, the insulation effect is improved, while the mechanical properties are weakened, suggesting pronounced thermal-mechanical coupling effect between loading bearing capacity and insulation effect. The heat transfer mechanism and characteristic revealed here provide the thermal basis for engineering applications of the ZrO2 and ZrB2 cellular sandwiches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据