4.7 Article

A MnN4 moiety embedded graphene as a magnetic gas sensor for CO detection: A first principle study

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 473, 期 -, 页码 820-827

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.209

关键词

Gas adsorption; Graphene-based sensors; Magnetic gas sensors and DFT

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund [RSA6180080]
  2. National Nanotechnology Center (NANOTEC)
  3. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission of Professional and Technical Service Platform for Designing and Manufacturing of Advanced Composite Materials [16DZ2292100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The feasibility of using a MnN4 moiety embedded graphene (MnN4-GP) as a gas sensor was investigated by density functional theory calculations. Thirteen gas molecules (CO, CO2, NO, NO2, N2O, SO2, NH3, H2O, H2S, CH4, O-2, H-2 and N-2) were considered. The adsorption behaviors of these gases on MnN4-GP were intensively analyzed in terms of adsorption structure, electronic charge, density of states (DOS), magnetic moments and recovery time. Among thirteen gases, NO, NO2, O-2, CO and SO2 adsorbed on MnN4-GP showed strong chemisorption energies, calculated to be - 2.30, - 1.42, - 1.32, -1.11 and - 0.51 eV, respectively, while the rest of the gases had physisorption interactions with MnN4-GP. Moreover, the strong chemisorption of the four gases drastically changed the DOS of MnN4-GP and pronounced charge transfer between the adsorbed gas and MnN4-GP. Interestingly, the magnetic moment of MnN4-GP was apparently changed from 3.01 mu(B) to 0.13, 1.04 and 2.01 mu(B), when it was adsorbed by NO, CO and NO2 gases, respectively, while it was hardly altered by other gases. In addition, the calculated recovery times at 423 K of NO, CO and NO2 are 2.5 x 10(14) s, 1.7 s and 8275 s, respectively. Such a short recovery time for CO detection makes MnN4-GP interesting as a sensor. When considering all calculated properties, MnN4-GP is proposed as a promising magnetic sensor for CO detection with high selectivity and high sensitivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据