4.6 Article

Indium silicon oxide thin films for infrared metaphotonics

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 114, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5089499

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [ECCS 1709704, ECCS 1643118]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We demonstrate silicon-doped indium oxide (ISO) with tunable epsilon near-zero and plasmonic behavior and propose it as a Si-compatible alternative material for metaphotonic applications in the mid-infrared (MIR) spectral range. ISO thin films were grown using DC and RF magnetron cosputtering deposition. Post-deposition thermal annealing was performed that resulted in large tunability of the optical dispersion data, as measured directly by variable-angle ellipsometry. Screened plasma wavelengths in the range 1.7 mu m-5.8 mu m were experimentally obtained depending on the annealing conditions. Moreover, ISO films with 350 nm thickness were investigated by atomic force microscopy that reveals a maximum rms roughness of 1.9 nm, enabling high-quality nanofabrication. In order to demonstrate the suitability of ISO thin films for the fabrication of plasmonic structures, we have produced ISO nanoparticle disk arrays using electron-beam lithography on Al2O3 substrates and shown, using both finite element method simulations and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, distinctive plasmonic resonances at MIR wavelengths tuned by the nanoparticles' spacing and aspect ratio. A figure of merit based on Mie theory is computed for spheres whose radii are either lambda/10 or lambda/3 over a broad spectral range that enables quantitative comparison with alternative plasmonic materials and reveals the full potential of ISO for engineering localized surface plasmons across the MIR spectral range. The development of fully Si-compatible plasmonic materials with engineered optical dispersion is important to enable cost-effective photonic-plasmonic high-density device integration for metaphotonic research. Published under license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据