4.7 Article

A novel multiplex xMAP assay for generic detection of avian, fish, and ruminant DNA in feed and feedstuffs

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 103, 期 11, 页码 4575-4584

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-019-09833-9

关键词

Animal species identification; Multiplex xMAP assay; Universal primers and probes; Feed and feedstuff

资金

  1. Science Research Program of Guangzhou, China [201707010487]
  2. Science and Technology Research Project of the former Guangdong Entry-exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau, China [2018GDK04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The identification of animal species in feed and feedstuffs is important for detecting contamination and fraudulent replacement of animal components that might cause health and economic problems. A novel multiplex assay, based on xMAP technology and the generic detection of closely related species, was developed for the simultaneous differential detection of avian, fish, and ruminant DNA in products. Universal primers and probes specific to avian, fish, or ruminant species were designed to target a conserved mitochondrial DNA sequence in the 12S ribosomal RNA gene (rRNA). The assay specificity was validated using samples of 27 target and 10 nontarget animal species. The limits of detection of the purified DNA were determined to be 0.2 pg/L-0.1 ng/L by testing the meat samples of six species and four feedstuffs. The detection sensitivity of the experimental mixtures was demonstrated to be 0.01% (weight percentage). The assay's suitability for practical application was evaluated by testing feed samples; unlabeled animal ingredients were detected in 32% of the 56 samples. The assay differentially detected the three targeted categories of animal species in less than 2 h, reflecting improvements in speed and efficiency. Based on these results, this novel multiplex xMAP assay provides a reliable and highly efficient technology for the routine detection of animal species in feed and other products for which this information is needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据