4.8 Article

Triple-Layered Carbon-SiO2 Composite Membrane for High Energy Density and Long Cycling Li-S Batteries

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 5900-5909

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b01703

关键词

C/SiO2 membrane; phase-inversion; multifunctional; Li-S batteries; energy storage

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21476044, 21676043, 21506028, 21706023, U1663223, 21776034]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT18JC14]
  3. Changjiang Scholars Program [T2012049]
  4. National Science Foundation Grant (NSF) [CMMI-1537894]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here we report a highly scalable yet flexible triple-layer structured porous C/SiO2 membrane via a facile phase inversion method for advancing Li-sulfur battery technology. As a multifunctional current-collector-free cathode, the conductive dense layer of the C/SiO2 membrane offers hierarchical macropores as an ideal sulfur host to alleviate the volume expansion of sulfur species and facilitate ion/electrolyte transport for fast kinetics, as well as spongelike pores to enable high sulfur loading. The triple-layer structured membrane cathode enables the filling of most sulfur species in the macropores and additional loading of a thin sulfur slurry on the membrane surface, which facilitates ion/electrolyte transport with faster kinetics than the conventional S/C slurry-based cathode. Furthermore, density functional theory simulations and visual adsorption measurements confirm the critical role of the doped SiO2 nanoparticles (similar to 10 nm) in the asymmetric C membrane in suppressing the shuttle effect of polysulfides via chemisorption and electrocatalysis. The rationally designed C/SiO2 membrane cathodes demonstrate long-term cycling stability of 300 cycles at a high sulfur loading of 2.8 mg cm(-2) with a sulfur content of similar to 75%. This scalable yet flexible self-supporting cathode design presents a useful strategy for realizing practical applications of high-performance Li-S batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据