4.6 Article

Value of information analysis for assessing risks and benefits of nanotechnology innovation

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE
卷 31, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s12302-019-0194-0

关键词

Value of information analysis; Risk assessment; Nanotechnology; Decision analysis; Emerging technology; Benefits; Industry; Innovation

资金

  1. Sustainable Nanotechnologies (SUN) Project [604305]
  2. Performance testing, calibration and implementation of a next generation system-of-systems Risk Governance Framework for nanomaterials (caLIBRAte) Project [686239]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Decisions on adoption of technological innovation are difficult for manufacturers, especially for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) who have limited resources but often drive product development. Decision analytic methods have been applied to regulatory issues in the nanotechnology sector but such applications to market innovation are not found in the literature. Value of information (VoI) is a decision analytic method for quantifying the benefit of acquiring additional information to support such analyses that can be used to help in a wide range of manufacturing decisions. Results: This paper develops a VoI methodology for comparative evaluation of technological alternatives and applies it to a real case study aimed at the selection between a coating system containing nano-TiO2 and alternative conventional paints. The aim of this approach is to aid SMEs and larger industries in deciding whether to further develop the nano-enabled product and in evaluating to which extent investing in more research about risks and/or benefits would be worthwhile. Conclusions: Results demonstrated how prioritization in information gaining can improve risk-benefit analyses and impact on both risk management and innovation decision making. By applying the proposed methodology, SMEs and larger industries might easily identify optimal data gathering and/or research strategies to formulate solid development and risk management plans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据