4.8 Article

PhaseStain: the digital staining of label-free quantitative phase microscopy images using deep learning

期刊

LIGHT-SCIENCE & APPLICATIONS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41377-019-0129-y

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NSF Engineering Research Center (ERC, PATHS-UP)
  2. Army Research Office (ARO) [W911NF-13-1-0419, W911NF-13-1-0197]
  3. ARO Life Sciences Division
  4. National Science Foundation (NSF) CBET Division Biophotonics Program
  5. NSF Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation (EFRI) Award
  6. NSF INSPIRE Award
  7. NSF Partnerships for Innovation: Building Innovation Capacity (PFI:BIC) Program
  8. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R21EB023115]
  9. Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI)
  10. Vodafone Americas Foundation
  11. Mary Kay Foundation
  12. Steven & Alexandra Cohen Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using a deep neural network, we demonstrate a digital staining technique, which we term PhaseStain, to transform the quantitative phase images (QPI) of label-free tissue sections into images that are equivalent to the brightfield microscopy images of the same samples that are histologically stained. Through pairs of image data (QPI and the corresponding brightfield images, acquired after staining), we train a generative adversarial network and demonstrate the effectiveness of this virtual-staining approach using sections of human skin, kidney, and liver tissue, matching the brightfield microscopy images of the same samples stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin, Jones' stain, and Masson's trichrome stain, respectively. This digital-staining framework may further strengthen various uses of label-free QPI techniques in pathology applications and biomedical research in general, by eliminating the need for histological staining, reducing sample preparation related costs and saving time. Our results provide a powerful example of some of the unique opportunities created by data-driven image transformations enabled by deep learning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据