4.6 Article

Damage mechanism of soil-rock mixture after freeze-thaw cycles

期刊

JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 13-24

出版社

JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIV
DOI: 10.1007/s11771-019-3979-9

关键词

soil-rock mixture; freeze-thaw cycle; large-scale triaxial test; strength between soil-rock particles

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50908234]
  2. Key Subject of Science and Technology Research and Development Plan of China Railway General Corporation [2017G002-K]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a widely distributed geological and engineering material, the soil-rock mixture always undergoes frequentative and short-term freeze-thaw cycles in some regions. Its internal structure is destroyed seriously, but the damage mechanism is not clear. Based on the damage factor, the damage research of properties of soil-rock mixture after different times of freeze-thaw cycles is investigated. Firstly, the size-distributed subgrade gravelly soil samples are prepared and undergo different times of freeze-thaw cycles periodically (0, 3, 6, 10), and indoor large-scale triaxial tests are completed. Secondly, the degradation degree of elastic modulus is considered as a damage factor, and applied to macro damage analysis of soil-rock mixture. Finally, the mesoscopic simulation of the experiments is achieved by PFC3D, and the influence on strength between soil-rock particles caused by freeze-thaw cycles is analyzed. The results show that freeze-thaw cycles cause internal damage of samples by weakening the strength between mesoscopic soil-rock particles, and ultimately affect the macro properties. After freeze-thaw cycles, on the macro-scale, elastic modulus and shear strength of soil-rock mixture both decrease, and the decreasing degree is related to the times of cycles with the mathmatical quadratic form; on the meso-scale, freeze-thaw cycles mainly cause the degradation of the strength between soil-rock particles whose properties are different significantly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据