4.7 Review

Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation During Pregnancy on Birth Size: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu11020442

关键词

nutrition; diet; vitamin D; birthweight; birth length; head circumference; gestational age; pregnancy outcomes

资金

  1. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies GF Ingrassia, University of Catania (Piano Triennale di Sviluppo delle Attivita di Ricerca Scientifica del Dipartimento-2016-2018)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During pregnancy, vitamin D supplementation may be a feasible strategy to help prevent low birthweight (LBW) and small for gestational age (SGA) births. However, evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is inconclusive, probably due to heterogeneity in study design and type of intervention. A systematic literature search in the PubMed-Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases was carried out to evaluate the effects of oral vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on birthweight, birth length, head circumference, LBW, and SGA. The fixed-effects or random-effects models were used to calculate mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), and 95% Confidence Interval (CI). On a total of 13 RCTs, maternal vitamin D supplementation had a positive effect on birthweight (12 RCTs; MD = 103.17 g, 95% CI 62.29-144.04 g), length (6 RCTs; MD = 0.22 cm, 95% CI 0.11-0.33 cm), and head circumference (6 RCTs; MD:0.19 cm, 95% CI 0.13-0.24 cm). In line with these findings, we also demonstrated that maternal vitamin D supplementation reduced the risk of LBW (3 RCTs; RR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.22-0.74) and SGA (5 RCTS; RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.51-0.92). The present systematic review and meta-analysis confirmed the well-established effect of maternal vitamin D supplementation on birth size. However, further research is required to better define risks and benefits associated with such interventions and the potential implications for public health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据