4.4 Article

Association between immune-related adverse events and prognosis in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.03.003

关键词

Immune checkpoint inhibitor; RCC; PD-1; Predictive marker; Prognostic marker; Adverse event

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) develop in a subset of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The relationship between presence of irAEs and prognosis in these patients remains unknown. Thus, we evaluated the prognostic impact of irAEs caused by nivolumab therapy in mRCC patients who had received prior molecular-targeted therapies. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 47 patients with mRCC who were treated with nivolumab after receiving at least 1 molecular-targeted therapy. The irAEs assessed in this study included cutaneous, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, hepatobiliary, renal, and other (rheumatic disease and pancreatitis) manifestations. The grade of irAEs was defined based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Results: In total, 23/47 patients (48.9%) experienced 29 irAEs. The most frequent irAE was rash/pruritus (12/23, 52.2%). The median progression- free survival (PFS) and overall survival after the initiation of nivolumab therapy were significantly longer in patients with irAEs than in those without irAEs (PFS: 13.1 vs. 4.87 months, P < 0.0001; overall survival: 26.0 vs. not reached, P = 0.0072). The multivariate analysis of PFS showed that irAE development was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio: 0.25, P = 0.0009). Additionally, the 2-cycle landmark analysis showed that PFS was significantly longer in patients with irAEs than in those without irAEs (median: not reached vs. 6.28 months, P = 0.0279). Conclusions: This retrospective study revealed a significant association between nivolumab-associated irAEs and prognosis in previously treated mRCC. Further prospective studies are necessary to confirm our findings. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据