4.2 Article

Penetrating head & neck trauma - Epidemiology and injury characteristics in terror-related violence, interpersonal violence and deliberate self-harm at a level 1 trauma centre

出版社

ROYAL COLLEGE SURGEONS EDINBURGH
DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2019.01.001

关键词

Trauma; Violence; Head & neck

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Penetrating trauma to the head and neck presents specific clinical challenges. Aetiologies include interpersonal violence, deliberate self-harm and terror-related violence. King's College Hospital is a Major Trauma Centre serving inner-city London boroughs with a high incidence of knife and gun crime. It also received victims of the terrorist attack at London Bridge in June 2017. Methods: Data was collected prospectively on all patients presenting with penetrating trauma to the head and neck over a one-year period (August 2016 July 2017). Results: Overall figures for penetrating trauma are the highest since comparable records began with 478 cases (2016/17) compared with 172 (2010/11). Most patients had injuries resulting from interpersonal violence (83%); a group consisting mostly in males (88%) under the age of 30 (69%). The sole fatality among all patients was a result of repeat deliberate self-harm. Terror-related violence victims were equally gender split and older; all patients in this group required surgical intervention and had longer lengths of stay (16.3 days) compared with interpersonal violence (6.3 days) and deliberate self-harm (3 days). Conclusion: Violent crime is increasing. Overall penetrating injury has more than doubled in 6 years. The injury characteristics observed are distinct depending on the assailants and motives. Head and neck trauma requires a multidisciplinary approach, with an understanding of the care needs of patients. Interpersonal violence is the most common aetiology and as such efforts to tackle rising violent crime must involve police and the community. In addition, terror-related violence is evolving in the United Kingdom and globally, and as such healthcare professionals must understand differences in aetiologies to promote optimal patient care. (C) 2019 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据