4.7 Article

Highly sensitive and selective isoprene sensing performance of ZnO quantum dots for a breath analyzer

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 290, 期 -, 页码 258-266

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.03.118

关键词

Gas sensor; ZnO; Nanoparticles; Quantum dots; Isoprene; Biomarker

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) by Korea government (the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning) [2017M3A9F1052297]
  2. Medium and Large Complex Technology Commercialization Project through the Commercialization Promotion Agency for R&D Outcomes by Korea government (the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning) [2019K000045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the quantum-size effect on the sensing properties of ZnO nanoparticles for the detection of isoprene. For this purpose, two types of ZnO particles with different sizes, including nanoparticles (NPs, (similar to)25 nm) and quantum dots (QDs, (similar to)5 nm), were prepared by a wet chemical method. The ZnO QDs exhibited excellent sensing performance to 1 ppm isoprene compared to NPs. The maximum sensing response and response time were (similar to)42 and 8 s at 350 degrees C for the QDs, while (similar to)5.6 and 40 s at 500 degrees C for the NPs, respectively. The higher sensing response, rapid response, and lower optimal working temperature of the ZnO QDs can be attributed to an increase in oxygen vacancies, band gap, and specific surface area owing to the small size effect. Both ZnO NPs and QDs showed the lower limit of 0.01 ppm for detecting isoprene. It is noted that the sensing properties of ZnO QDs to 1 ppm isoprene are superior to previously reported isoprene sensors that are based on semiconducting metal oxides. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the low concentration (0.4-6.2 ppm) of isoprene can be selectively detected within (similar to)83 s using a recently developed miniaturized gas chromatography integrated with the ZnO QD sensor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据