4.7 Article

Effect of foliar application of NPK nanoparticle fertilization on yield and genotoxicity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 653, 期 -, 页码 1128-1139

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.023

关键词

NPK NPs; Morphology; Yield; Chromosomal aberration; Genotoxicity effects; Wheat

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University [RG 1435-011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two field experiments were conducted at the experimental farm of the Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Abess Region, Alexandria University, Egypt, over two harvest seasons (2016/2017 and 2017/2018) to study the effect of a nanoparticle fertilizer (Hyper Feed Amino NPs) compound on productivity and genotoxicity in two wheat cultivars compared with conventional mineral fertilizer. Total yield, its components, and yield components were measured. After harvest, grains of both cultivars were collected and germinated to produce root tip. Mitosis division and chromosomal aberrations were observed. Mitotic indexes (%) were obtained from an analysis of about 2000 cells. Root tips of control treatments showed normalmitotic stages, and themitotic index ranged from 61.67 +/- 8.40 to 68.49 +/- 11.23%. Although fertilization with NPK NPs produced an increase in yield, and root-tip cells showed various types of chromosomal aberrations such as multinuclei, micronuclei, abnormal metaphase, stickiness, nucleus erosion, nucleus elongation, fragments, c-metaphase, chromosome deletion, c-chromosome, gab chromosome, lagging chromosome, distributed anaphase, bridge, abnormal telophase, telophase with unequal division, cell membrane damage, cell elongation, and increased nuclear content. The 100% NPK NPs treatment produced 35.79 +/- 9.32% and 38.98 +/- 4.22% abnormal cells in Sids 12 and Al-Rasheed, respectively. Our results demonstrate that wheat root tip cells readily internalize NPK NPs which can interfere with normal cell function. (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据