4.8 Article

Structure-guided design fine-tunes pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and antitumor profile of multispecific frizzled antibodies

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1817246116

关键词

antibody therapeutic; Frizzled receptors; Wnt signaling; X-ray crystallography; protein engineering

资金

  1. Mitacs Accelerate Grant [IT06689]
  2. Canada Research Chairs program
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  5. University of Saskatchewan
  6. Government of Saskatchewan
  7. Western Economic Diversification Canada
  8. National Research Council Canada
  9. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  10. National Cancer Institute [ACB-12002]
  11. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [AGM-12006]
  12. NIH-Office of Research Infrastructure Programs, High-End Instrumentation Grant [1S10OD012289-01A1]
  13. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aberrant activation of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling occurs frequently in cancer. However, therapeutic targeting of this pathway is complicated by the role of Wnt in stem cell maintenance and tissue homeostasis. Here, we evaluated antibodies blocking 6 of the 10 human Wnt/Frizzled (FZD) receptors as potential therapeutics. Crystal structures revealed a common binding site for these monodonal antibodies (mAbs) on FZD, blocking the interaction with the Wnt palmitoleic acid moiety. However, these mAbs displayed gastroin-testinal toxicity or poor plasma exposure in vivo. Structure-guided engineering was used to refine the binding of each mAb for FZD receptors, resulting in antibody variants with improved in vivo tolerability and developability. Importantly, the lead variant mAb significantly inhibited tumor growth in the HPAF-II pancreatic tumor xenograft model. Taken together, our data demonstrate that anti-FZD cancer therapeutic antibodies with broad specificity can be fine-tuned to navigate in vivo exposure and tolerability while driving therapeutic efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据