4.8 Article

Cryo-electron microscopy structure of the filamentous bacteriophage IKe

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1811929116

关键词

filamentous virus; cryo-EM structure; symmetry mismatch; single-stranded circular DNA; helical reconstruction

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFA0501100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31861143027, 31470721]
  3. 973 Program [2015CB910102]
  4. Junior Thousand Talents Program of China
  5. Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases
  6. Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology
  7. joint Natural Science Foundation of China-Israel Science Foundation Grant [2423/18]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The filamentous bacteriophage IKe infects Escherichia coli cells bearing IncN pili. We report the cryo-electron microscopy structure of the micrometer-long IKe viral particle at a resolution of 3.4 angstrom. The major coat protein [protein 8 (p8)] consists of 47 residues that fold into a similar to 68-angstrom-long helix. An atomic model of the coat protein was built. Five p8 helices in a horizontal layer form a pentamer, and symmetrically neighboring p8 layers form a right-handed helical cylinder having a rise per pentamer of 16.77 angstrom and a twist of 38.52 degrees. The inner surface of the capsid cylinder is positively charged and has direct interactions with the encapsulated circular single-stranded DNA genome, which has an electron density consistent with an unusual left-handed helix structure. Similar to capsid structures of other filamentous viruses, strong capsid packing in the IKe particle is maintained by hydrophobic residues. Despite having a different length and large sequence differences from other filamentous phages, pi-pi interactions were found between Tyr9 of one p8 and Trp29 of a neighboring p8 in IKe that are similar to interactions observed in phage M13, suggesting that, despite sequence divergence, overall structural features are maintained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据