4.7 Article

A unifying correlation for laminar particle deposition in 90-degree pipe bends

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 345, 期 -, 页码 99-110

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.12.095

关键词

Particle deposition; Pipe bend; Secondary flow; Dean number

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP160101953]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pipe networks and ducting systems present a myriad of pipe geometry combinations e.g. pipe diameter, bend radius, flowrate-with each of these parameters leading to different flow fields. When particles are suspended in the flow, the fluid-particle dynamics then depend on the particle diameter as well. The literature review showed a variety of particle deposition studies with a prevalence towards turbulent flow studies, and no preference for a specific pipe configuration. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of micron particle deposition in laminar pipe bend flows. The data set consisted of combinations of 8 pipe diameters, 9 bend radii, 3 Reynolds numbers, and 30 particle diameters (from 1 1 mu m to 100 mu m). The secondary flow was visualized by vortex cores and streamlines were seen wrapping around the cores. This depicted the swirling behavior as the flow shifted from a horizontal to vertical direction that influenced the particle deposition. The deposition efficiency for combinations of the pipe geometry, flow condition, and particle diameter were plotted against the particle Stokes number. The deposition profile demonstrated a sigmoidal shape and an arctan function is proposed as the unifying correlation for micron particle deposition in 90-degree bends, given as eta = 2/pi tan(-1) (aSt(b)). A limitation of the model is that it doesn't account for sedimentation effects, which could affect the particle locations at the bend entrance, particularly for particles >30 mu m. For particle <30 mu m there was inconsistent data for the case where St<0.2 for with bend ratios R-o < 4.0. However, the correlation was very reliable for R-o > 4.0, and Re > 1000. Crown Copyright (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据