4.7 Article

Inheritance and fitness costs of sulfoxaflor resistance in Nilaparvata lugens (Stal)

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 75, 期 11, 页码 2981-2988

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ps.5412

关键词

Nilaparvata lugens (Stal); sulfoxaflor; resistance inheritance; fitness costs

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31501670] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Hubei Provincial Committee of the Communist Youth League of China Funding Source: Medline
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0200500] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Sulfoxaflor has been considered as a new tool for Nilaparvata lugens control in the field. In this study, a laboratory-selected resistant strain and a susceptible strain were used to evaluate the inheritance and fitness costs of sulfoxaflor resistance in N. lugens. RESULTS The resistant strain (SFX-SEL) showed 123.63-fold resistance compared with the susceptible strain (SS). Progenies of reciprocal crosses (F1RS and F1SR) showed similar concentration-mortality responses (LC50) to sulfoxaflor and also exhibited a similar degree of dominance; -0.16 for F1RS and -0.26 for F1SR. Significant differences between the observed and expected mortalities of F-2 individuals suggested that sulfoxaflor resistance is associated with multiple genes. The resistant strain had a relative fitness of 0.75 with substantially decreased female adult period, oviposition days, total fecundity, egg hatchability and female adult survival rate, and prolonged pre-adult period and total pre-oviposition period. CONCLUSION Sulfoxaflor resistance in N. lugens was inherited as autosomal, incompletely recessive and multigene. The development of resistance may have a significant fitness cost for the resistant population. Current research provides valuable information for researchers to establish management strategies to delay the development of sulfoxaflor resistance and control N. lugens sustainably in the field. (c) 2019 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据