4.6 Article

An adaptive immune algorithm for service-oriented agricultural Internet of Things

期刊

NEUROCOMPUTING
卷 344, 期 -, 页码 3-12

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.06.094

关键词

Internet of Things (IoT); Agricultural; Immune algorithm; Dynamic service; Multiple requests

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61473078, 61603090]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars from the Ministry of Education
  3. International Collaborative Project of the Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology [16510711100]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2232017D-08, 2232017D-13]
  5. Agricultural Project of the Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology [16391902800]
  6. Shanghai Science and Technology Promotion Project from Shanghai Municipal Agriculture Commission [2016-1-5-12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Internet of Things (IoT) has the characteristics of multi-source, multi-type and unequal amount of task. Considering multiple requests at stochastic moment in the agricultural IoT service, an optimization model of minimum service cost is built in this paper, and an adaptive immune algorithm with endocrine regulation (AIE) is proposed to solve the problem of dynamic service for multiple requests. Based on this model, two service providing strategies are put forward, i.e. single service and collaborative service. The former means that one request task is completed by one service provider, while the latter means that one request task is collaboratively completed by multiple service providers. The service cost and service time are respectively evaluated under two service providing strategies. The simulation results verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed AIE through comparison to the immune algorithm without endocrine regulation. Meanwhile, it is demonstrated that the proposed AIE can obtain more excellent performance than genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据