4.8 Article

Deacylative transformations of ketones via aromatization-promoted C-C bond activation

期刊

NATURE
卷 567, 期 7748, 页码 373-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-0926-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS [R01GM109054]
  2. Charles H. Viol Fellowship
  3. University of Chicago
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb Graduate Fellowship
  5. China Scholarship Council [201603170182]
  6. NSF [CHE-1654122]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon-hydrogen (C-H) and carbon-carbon (C-C) bonds are the main constituents of organic matter. Recent advances in C-H functionalization technology have vastly expanded our toolbox for organic synthesis1. By contrast, C-C activation methods that enable editing of the molecular skeleton remain limited(2-7). Several methods have been proposed for catalytic C-C activation, particularly with ketone substrates, that are typically promoted by using either ring-strain release as a thermodynamic driving force(4,6) or directing groups(5,7) to control the reaction outcome. Although effective, these strategies require substrates that contain highly strained ketones or a preinstalled directing group, or are limited to more specialist substrate classes(5). Here we report a general C-C activation mode driven by aromatization of a pre-aromatic intermediate formed in situ. This reaction is suitable for various ketone substrates, is catalysed by an iridium/phosphine combination and is promoted by a hydrazine reagent and 1,3-dienes. Specifically, the acyl group is removed from the ketone and transformed to a pyrazole, and the resulting alkyl fragment undergoes various transformations. These include the deacetylation of methyl ketones, carbenoid-free formal homologation of aliphatic linear ketones and deconstructive pyrazole synthesis from cyclic ketones. Given that ketones are prevalent in feedstock chemicals, natural products and pharmaceuticals, these transformations could offer strategic bond disconnections in the synthesis of complex bioactive molecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据