4.7 Review

Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase Activating Polypeptide in Stress-Related Disorders: Data Convergence from Animal and Human Studies

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 78, 期 3, 页码 167-177

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.12.003

关键词

Amygdala; Anxiety; Bed nucleus of the stria terminalis; Fear; Pain; Parabrachial nucleus

资金

  1. National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  2. University of Vermont College of Arts and Sciences
  3. Center of Biomedical Research Excellence in Neuroscience at the University of Vermont (National Institutes of Health National Center for Research Resources) [P20RR16435]
  4. [MH-97988]
  5. [MH-072088]
  6. [MH-096764]
  7. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P20RR016435] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [P30GM103498] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [F32MH072088, R01MH097988, R01MH096764, R21MH080935] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The maladaptive expression and function of several stress-associated hormones have been implicated in pathological stress and anxiety-related disorders. Among these, recent evidence has suggested that pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide ( PACAP) has critical roles in central neurocircuits mediating stress-related emotional behaviors. We describe the PACAPergic systems, the data implicating PACAP in stress biology, and how altered PACAP expression and signaling may result in psychopathologies. We include our work implicating PACAP signaling within the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in mediating the consequences of stressor exposure and relatedly, describe more recent studies suggesting that PACAP in the central nucleus of the amygdala may impact the emotional aspects of chronic pain states. In aggregate, these results are consistent with data suggesting that PACAP dysregulation is associated with posttraumatic stress disorder in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据